英語(yǔ)評(píng)價(jià)，幫忙寫(xiě)個(gè)英文自我評(píng)價(jià)

來(lái)源：整理時(shí)間：2023-06-29 23:13:27 編輯：好學(xué)習(xí) 手機(jī)版

1，幫忙寫(xiě)個(gè)英文自我評(píng)價(jià)

i am a person who has stable personality and high sense of responsibility. By studying and working for three years in campus, i have obtained the technical knowledge and skills, also i am highly organized and effecient, at the meantime i have good representation skills.

幫忙寫(xiě)個(gè)英文自我評(píng)價(jià)

2，怎樣寫(xiě)英文評(píng)論

英語(yǔ)的評(píng)論技巧：）~~ 首先，邊閱讀，邊就情節(jié)和內(nèi)容做筆記，記下日后可能闡發(fā)的評(píng)論。你會(huì)驚奇地發(fā)現(xiàn)，閱讀時(shí)手邊有一只鉛筆，會(huì)使理解更為深人。閱讀報(bào)刊雜志上的書(shū)評(píng)也會(huì)使你受益良多。許多國(guó)家和地區(qū)出版物都辟有書(shū)評(píng)專欄或?qū)ｍ?yè)，一般在接近封底處。不妨花些時(shí)間到圖書(shū)館瀏覽最新幾期的《書(shū)籍分類目錄》和《當(dāng)代文藝評(píng)論與批評(píng)》，這里發(fā)表有大多數(shù)著名作家早期作品的書(shū)評(píng)摘要，由此可獲得有價(jià)值的參考文獻(xiàn)。在此你還可讀到那些你沒(méi)有時(shí)間去看的書(shū)的簡(jiǎn)略的情節(jié)摘要，這為你寫(xiě)書(shū)評(píng)提供了很好的背景知識(shí)。一篇好的評(píng)論應(yīng)包括以下方面： 1．一個(gè)生動(dòng)的開(kāi)場(chǎng)白：用一兩個(gè)簡(jiǎn)短的段落揭示作者的姓名、書(shū)名，以及有關(guān)作者的簡(jiǎn)要信息，如過(guò)去的作品、曾獲得的榮譽(yù)。 2．如果是小說(shuō)，對(duì)情節(jié)做簡(jiǎn)要勾勒，如果作品不是小說(shuō)，寫(xiě)明寫(xiě)作目的和主題。 3．評(píng)論作者對(duì)此優(yōu)缺點(diǎn)的評(píng)論。 4．用一個(gè)總結(jié)性的語(yǔ)句式段落使讀者對(duì)此書(shū)有一個(gè)總體印象。開(kāi)篇寫(xiě)好開(kāi)篇段落對(duì)書(shū)評(píng)來(lái)說(shuō)非常有挑戰(zhàn)性，其目的是抓住讀者的注意力，使他們產(chǎn)生讀這篇文章的熱切愿望。適當(dāng)?shù)匾脮?shū)中原文可使讀者產(chǎn)生真實(shí)的感受。要尋找那些機(jī)智、動(dòng)人或有力的話語(yǔ)，并對(duì)它們產(chǎn)生的背景作一番描述。除非編輯準(zhǔn)許你篇幅拉長(zhǎng)，一般情況下，一定要將引言限制在一兩句之內(nèi)。不要忘記在每句引文后面注上頁(yè)碼出處，這樣編輯可以核實(shí)。最后簡(jiǎn)要的總結(jié) 使用有力度的詞語(yǔ)，盡量簡(jiǎn)短地總結(jié)你對(duì)此書(shū)的觀點(diǎn)。如果可能，與篇首的評(píng)論遙相呼應(yīng)

怎樣寫(xiě)英文評(píng)論

3，寫(xiě)一篇英語(yǔ)評(píng)價(jià)

首先，應(yīng)當(dāng)理解題意；其次，應(yīng)善于謀篇布局，而不是生硬得翻譯，在每個(gè)論點(diǎn)開(kāi)始時(shí)最好要有一定的連接詞，比如first,second,third;first of all,then,in addition,what is more,finally；再者，應(yīng)當(dāng)善于運(yùn)用高中階段所學(xué)的各種句型語(yǔ)法，比如定語(yǔ)從句、同位語(yǔ)從句、動(dòng)名詞的符合結(jié)構(gòu)等等還有一些常用的句子，應(yīng)善于積累；最后就是整體的事了，段落安排是否合理、書(shū)面是否工整、盡量減少語(yǔ)法錯(cuò)誤和拼寫(xiě)錯(cuò)誤、字?jǐn)?shù)在80到120之間。

其實(shí)你在google里搜索 kungfu panda review，在google里搜索一下就可以了找到了。以后找別的電影評(píng)論鍵入此電影的英文名字，再加review就可以搜到相關(guān)評(píng)論了。一下給一篇作為參考：Thanks for checking out our Kung Fu Panda review. I still remember way back in 2005 when I first heard about Kung Fu Panda I thought it was a pathetic idea. My thoughts had to do with 2 things… the concept and using Jack Black. Both I thought were terrible ideas that seemed to me to lend themselves to yet another cookie cutter, annoying, cheap and witless animated film (non-pixar) that would just rely on fart jokes, burp jokes, fart jokes and basically any simple little thing it takes to amuse 10 year old kids (which is just about anything) without bother to put any quality story telling or themes or idea into it. Just have Jack Black talk in outrageous tones, flash some pretty colors and have Po (thats the name of the Panda) fart.Yes, I thought I could already see the entire movie playing itself out in my head just from hearing the concept alone. So off I went to see Kung Fu Panda the other day. Was I correct in my first impressions? Actually… no I wasnt. Its actually not a bad film at all.THE GENERAL IDEAThe synopsis for Kung Fu Panda looks something like this: “A clumsy panda bear becomes an unlikely kung fu hero when a treacherous enemy spreads chaos throughout the countryside in this animated martial arts adventure featuring the voices of Jack Black, Dustin Hoffman, Angelina Jolie, and Jackie Chan. On the surface, Po (voice of Black) may look like just another portly panda bear, but beneath his fur he bears the mark of the chosen one. By day, Po works faithfully in his familys noodle shop, but by night he dreams of becoming a true master of the martial arts. Now an ancient prophecy has come to pass, and Po realizes that he is the only one who can save his people from certain destruction. With time running short and malevolent snow leopard Tai Lung (Ian McShane ) closing in, Furious Five legends Tigress (Jolie), Crane (David Cross ), Mantis (Seth Rogen), Viper (Lucy Liu), Monkey (Chan), and their wise sensei, Master Shifu (Hoffman), all draw on their vast knowledge of fighting skills in order to transform a lumbering panda bear into a lethal fighting machine. Now, if the noble Po can master the martial arts and somehow transform his greatest weaknesses into his greatest strengths, he will fulfill his destiny as the hero who saved his people during their darkest hour.”THE GOOD“The most important element” in any film will vary according to its genre. For a film like Kung Fu Panda clearly the most important element it needed to pull off was comedy. If a film like this one doesnt make you laugh… then there isnt much left to fall back on. Thankfully the movie succeeds quite well on this level. I cant recall any more than 1 hard belly laugh (usually a decent comedy needs much more than that), but it felt like it at least always had me smiling or giggling through the run time. Almost none of the joke were home runs… but then did all work. The end result was I found myself entertained almost all the way through.Coming up with a good villain in a kids film is no easy task. The character has to be menacing, but at the same time you cant give kids nightmarish visions and make them crap themselves. I mean come on… its Kung Fu Panda… you cant exactly have Violator (from the Spawn comics) showing up can causing kids across the nation to spontaneously crap themselves in their theater seats… then requiring therapy for the next 3 years to make the nightmares go away! It is a fine and delicate balance… and the villain in Kung Fu Panda, Tai Lung, was PERFECT. He was certainly menacing… but at the same time easy enough for the kids to handle without needing pampers. I think the presence of such a villain really helped the film work.Doing good action in an animated film is also no easy task. I mean, its easy enough to DO… just not so easy to do WELL. However, Kung Fu Panda and the folks at Dreamworks really did pull of some BEAUTIFUL animation with complex yet extremely smooth kung fu fighting that was a treat to watch. It was also a lot of fun seeing how each character had a totally different fighting style in keeping with which animal they were. I mean come on… how on earth do you animate a snake doing Kung Fu and have it look cool? Well… they found a way!THE BADThere isnt a lot to complain about in this movie, but I will raise a couple of issues. First of all, some of the voice casting felt completely wrong. I worship the ground Dustin Hoffman walks on… but him as the voice of the sage Chinese Kung Fu master that trains the furious 5 and Po??? It just didnt fit. Seth Rogen as one of the furious 5? I hope Im not just being picky… but whenever these guys spoke (especially Rogen) it just kinda pulled me out of the movie. It was just really conspicuous.I would have liked to have seen more about the furious 5 characters (the tiger, crane, monkey, viper and the mantis. I think Jackie Chan had like 2 lines… but I mean more in the sense of seeing even just a 2 minute segment of where they each came from and how they ended up at the temple in the first place. Not a major complaint… but it did keep popping into my head as I was watching it.OVERALLContrary to my initial impressions, Kung Fu Panda ends up being a funny (not outright hilarious), exciting, well animated and beautiful to look at movie that both kids and yes, even adults will enjoy. Some poor voice casting and a few character left without being fleshed out much didnt become major distractions to enjoying the movie. Could have taken or left Jack Black as the lead voice… but he didnt detract from the film in anyway. Its no Pixar film… but very good nonetheless. Overall I give Kung Fu Panda a 7.5 out of 10.

寫(xiě)一篇英語(yǔ)評(píng)價(jià)